loading...

Our Team

Back
Pietro Marino
Senior Consultant
Expertise
  • Fraud
  • Investment Arbitration
  • Partnership Disputes
  • Energy
Admissions
  • Law Society of England and Wales
Qualifications & Education
  • Law (BA), Durham University 1988
  • Law Society Finals 1989
Languages
  • Italian (fluent)
  • Spanish (working knowledge)
  • French (working knowledge)
Testimonials

Pietro has a broad commercial disputes practice with a strong emphasis on high value commercial fraud, asset tracing/ value recovery, offshore contentious trust litigation and cross border disputes in the oil & gas and metals sectors.

He frequently acts as lead lawyer in litigation straddling several jurisdictions, advising on strategy and its implementation, including the deployment of, or reacting to, insolvency related litigation initiatives. Pietro represented the successful appellant in the Privy Council decision in Vadim Schmidt v. Rosewood (concerning disclosure of documents by Trustees of discretionary trusts) and acted in the Bank of New York money laundering investigation. Pietro co-ordinated a team comprising various overseas law firms in a cross-border commodities fraud case where the lead action was litigated successfully before the Singapore Court. He represented a group of former Hammonds partners in their dispute against their former firm and advised Boris Berezovsky in his successful opposition to Roman Abramovich’s application to strike out Mr Berezovsky’s claim. Pietro has acted in several disputes concerning the breakdown of joint venture and other commercial relationships in the telecoms, metals and oil & gas sectors in former CIS countries which have given rise to worldwide related litigation and arbitration.

Background

Pietro graduated from Durham University. He qualified with Theodore Goddard in 1992 and became a partner at that firm in 1999. Following the merger with Addleshaw Booth & Co, Pietro formed the Fraud and Financial Regulatory Contentious Group (part of the Contentious Group), which he headed until his departure in 2010.

Cases include
  • The Libyan Investment Authority -v- Goldman Sachs [2016] EWHC 2530 (Ch); [2014] EWHC 3364 (Ch)
  • The Libyan Investment Authority v. Société Générale S.A. & Ors [2016] EWHC 2773 (Comm); [2016] EWHC 375 (Comm); [2015] EWHC 1720 (QB); [2015] EWHC 550 (QB)
  • Vadim Schmidt -v- Rosewood (2003) UK PC 26
  • Malaysian International Trading Corp Sdn Bhd -v- Interamerica Asia Pte Ltd [2002] 2 SLR (R)
  • Global Multimedia International Ltd -v- ARA Media Services [2007] 1 ALL ER (Comm) 1160
  • Hammonds (A Firm) v. Danilunas [2009] EWHC 216 (CH)
  • Berezovsky -v- Abramovich [2010] EWHC 647 (Comm)
  • Erste Group Bank AG -v- JSC “VMZ Red October” & Ors [2013] EWHC 2926 (Comm) 
  • Anglo Petroleum -v- TFB (Mortgages) Ltd  [2003] EWHC 3125
  • Global -v- AMS & MBC [2006] EWHC 3107 (Ch)
  • Ackerman -v- Ackerman [2012] EWCA Civ 768
Testimonials
News
Jul 9, 2024
The importance of directors’ knowledge in establishing the largest ever wrongful trading award and the first ever award for “misfeasant trading”
The High Court recently issued its judgment against two former directors of BHS Group Limited, Mr Henningson and Mr Chandler...
Jul 4, 2024
Supreme Court rules that planning authorities cannot give permission for oil drilling projects without considering the environmental effects of the oil’s combustion
On 20 June 2024, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in R (on the application of Finch on behalf...
Jul 2, 2024
UK sanctions ground payment obligations under letters of credit in aircraft leasing case
In Celestial Aviation Services Limited v UniCredit Bank GmbH, London Branch [2024] EWCA Civ 628, the Court of Appeal held...
Jun 13, 2024
Fair winds favour plaintiffs in wasted expenditure cases
A recent judgment of the High Court of Australia has clarified aspects of contract law and the availability of damages...