loading...
Published on March 14, 2017
ICSID award no replacement for annulled OHADA award (Getma v Guinea)

Dr Rémy Gerbay, Of Counsel at Enyo Law and lecturer at Queen Mary, University of London, considers what lessons can be learnt from the complex parallel commercial and investment arbitrations in Getma v Guinea. The following interview was first published by Lexis Nexis PSL on 20 August 2016. To view this article, please download the pdf using the link below.

Click download PDF to view full article.

DOWNLOAD PDF

News
Oct 30, 2024
D’Aloia v Persons Unknown: a landmark judgment on tracing crypto fraud
Those following developments in the crypto space will be familiar with D’Aloia. In a judgment spanning over 80-pages handed down...
Oct 23, 2024
The science of memory: assessing evidence in complex litigation
In Jaffé v Greybull Capital and others [2024] EWHC 2534 (Comm), Cockerill J highlights the importance of understanding the dynamic...
Oct 17, 2024
Enyo Law has once again been ranked in Chambers and Partners UK 2025
We are delighted to share that once again, Enyo Law has been ranked in the latest edition of the Chambers...
Oct 16, 2024
The big freeze 2: Isabel dos Santos v Unitel S.A. [2024] EWCA Civ 1109
Following on from our previous article (The big freeze: Unitel SA v Unitel International Holdings BV & Anor) on the...