loading...
Published on March 14, 2017
Due Paranoia (Part 2): Assessing the Enforcement Risk Under the English Arbitration Act

This blog was originally published on the Kluwer Arbitration Blog on 20 February 2017 and focuses on applications made to the English courts to resist enforcement of foreign awards. Due Paranoia (Part 1).

The first blog in this two-part series, was published last year:  http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2016/06/06/due-process-paranoia

Please see here for more information: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2017/02/20/due-process-paranoia-part-2-assessing-the-enforcement-risk-under-the-english-arbitration-act/

News
Apr 16, 2025
The Lawyer Spotlight: Avoiding the rabbit holes with Enyo’s investigations unit
Enyo Law's Business Intelligence unit was recently featured in The Lawyer. Established in 2015, our Business Intelligence and Investigation unit...
Apr 7, 2025
“Even Homer nods”: English Court upholds third s68 Arbitration Act challenge in 2025 due to “Serious Irregularity” by Arbitral Tribunal
Successful challenges to arbitration awards under s68 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 (the “Act”) are rare. Their rarity reflects...
Apr 3, 2025
Enyo Law clients successfully defend application for anti-suit injunction in Court of Appeal
In Renaissance Securities (Cyprus) Limited v ILLC Chlodwig Enterprises and Others, Enyo Law successfully represented ILLC Adorabella and Perpecia Limited...
Apr 2, 2025
Enyo Law secures important victory for Federico Faleschini after collapse of ex-Ferrari Chairman’s family fraud case
Enyo Law has successfully had claims of fraud and unlawful means conspiracy brought by the di Montezemolo family against Federico...