loading...
Published on March 14, 2017
Due Paranoia (Part 2): Assessing the Enforcement Risk Under the English Arbitration Act

This blog was originally published on the Kluwer Arbitration Blog on 20 February 2017 and focuses on applications made to the English courts to resist enforcement of foreign awards. Due Paranoia (Part 1).

The first blog in this two-part series, was published last year:  http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2016/06/06/due-process-paranoia

Please see here for more information: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2017/02/20/due-process-paranoia-part-2-assessing-the-enforcement-risk-under-the-english-arbitration-act/

News
Oct 30, 2024
D’Aloia v Persons Unknown: a landmark judgment on tracing crypto fraud
Those following developments in the crypto space will be familiar with D’Aloia. In a judgment spanning over 80-pages handed down...
Oct 23, 2024
The science of memory: assessing evidence in complex litigation
In Jaffé v Greybull Capital and others [2024] EWHC 2534 (Comm), Cockerill J highlights the importance of understanding the dynamic...
Oct 17, 2024
Enyo Law has once again been ranked in Chambers and Partners UK 2025
We are delighted to share that once again, Enyo Law has been ranked in the latest edition of the Chambers...
Oct 16, 2024
The big freeze 2: Isabel dos Santos v Unitel S.A. [2024] EWCA Civ 1109
Following on from our previous article (The big freeze: Unitel SA v Unitel International Holdings BV & Anor) on the...